# Difference between Law and Theory

##### Key difference: Law and theory are two terms that are often used in context of scientific terminology. The main difference between a law and a theory is that a theory tries to explain the reasoning behind something that occurs in nature, whereas scientific laws are just descriptive accounts of how something occurs in nature.

law and hypothesis are two terms that are frequently used in context of scientific terminology. A law chiefly refers to a instruction that is broadly considered as fact by the scientific community. The argue as to why the law is true may not be known, however, the fact that it is, is obviously visible .
For example : Newton ’ s Law of Gravity, which states that all objects in the universe are attracted to each other, and hence are probably to pull each other towards themselves with a force, i.e. the gravitational coerce. The law is considered to be true and taken as a fact because it can be observed, i.e. everything throw in the air travel falls back to the earth. The cause for this is not stated nor explained by the law. The law merely states that the object does fall to the earth every time. Hence, it must be true .
however, since then, other scientists have studied the reason as to why the objects do fall in the manner that they do. These scientists have attempted to explain the argue behind the law. These attempted reasoning are known as ‘ Theories. ’

For exemplar : Einstein ’ s Theory of Gravity which aimed to explain how and why graveness worked, an explanation which was not adequately covered by Newton ’ s Law of Gravity. Newton ’ s Law of Gravity merely stated that it did and how.

A scientific theory is basically a type of explanation for the way things occur in the universe. It offers an explanation that is consistent with the scientific method acting, and it besides fulfills the criteria required by modern skill. It can besides be said that theories are tested and proved hypotheses, which are confirmed through observation and experiment .
A hypothesis is only valid up until the time that there is evidence to disprove it. equally soon as that evidence is found then, the theory is disproven and is no longer valid. A newfangled theory would then be formed taking in consideration the newfangled evidence on the matter .
The main dispute between a law and a hypothesis is that a theory tries to explain the reason behind something that occurs in nature, whereas scientific laws are just descriptive accounts of how something occurs in nature. Hence, laws are limited and can alone be applied in certain instances. however, it is by and large considered that laws are constantly true, whereas people are constantly trying to disprove theories .