Nest didn ’ thymine do that. rather, the company that made the fresh thermostat democratic with a $ 250 device made a new thermostat that is just deoxyadenosine monophosphate good as the original, and knocked $ 80 off the price ( chiefly because it won ’ metric ton be compatible with some higher-end heating system and cooling systems ) .
If you ’ re in the market for a smart thermostat and the Nest Thermostat E works with your system, you should buy it. ( If you have a two report firm or a basement you might want to look at an Ecobee thermostat, which comes with outside temperature sensors. ) It works equitable angstrom good as the flagship Nest Thermostat, it ’ second cheaper, and the features it is missing are inconsequent at best .
here are the differences between the $ 249 Nest Thermostat and the $ 169 Nest Thermostat E :
Bạn đang đọc: Nest’s cheaper thermostat is better than the original
- The Nest Thermostat has a full-color display and a feature called Farsight that will show you the time, weather, or temperature from across the room. The Nest Thermostat E has a frosted display that only shows the indoor temperature.
- The Nest Thermostat works with 95 percent of homes. The Nest Thermostat E works with 85 percent of homes.
- The Nest Thermostat has a metal ring and comes in multiple colors. The Nest Thermostat E has a plastic ring and only comes in white.
They both work with services like Alexa and Google Assistant ( placid no HomeKit support for some reason ), you can control them both away from your home with the Nest app, and all of the energy-saving features that make the original Nest great are in full available on the cheaper edition .
I ’ ve been using the Nest Thermostat E for the past few weeks, trying to decipher why anyone would buy the more expensive adaptation if both are compatible with your inflame and cooling system system. There are no physique quality issues, initiation was easier than I expected, and the auto-scheduling feature works well adequate that it hasn ’ metric ton been excessively hot or besides cold in my theater in days.
I waffled for years on buying a Nest because, well, it ’ south $ 250 and I spend literally no time looking at my thermostat. But if you knock about $ 100 off that ? With no missing features ? now we ’ rhenium talking. And I think that ’ s how most people will feel about it.
If spend $ 170 will lower my energy bill and let me control the temperature from my phone, that ’ mho hard to pass up. And that ’ s what Nest is ultimately hoping for. The company says it wants to sell two to three times as many units over the future four years, and the E will likely help it do that. But I don ’ thyroxine know if Nest expected its budget option to potentially cannibalize its flagship device. That ’ s always a possibility when you make alike products at different monetary value points, and safeguards are normally put in to stop that from happening .
That obviously didn ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate happen this time around. The best Nest is no long the original. It ’ s the Thermostat E .